Friday, February 21, 2020

Contemporary business leaders Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Contemporary business leaders - Essay Example rectors and well as the National Football Foundation, and in 2014, he was made a public declaration that he was gay, making him the first chief executive of a Fortune 500 company to make such as a declaration. After Tim Cook Graduated from the Auburn University, he worked for twelve years in IBM personal computer business and eventually served as the director in charge of North American Fulfilment. He went on to serve as the Chief Operations Officer in charge of the computer reseller section on Intelligent Electronic and then became the president for Corporate Materials at Compaq for a short period. Cook joined Apple in 1998 after he met the then CEO, Steve Jobs for the first time with his first assignment being to become the Senior Vice President, where Cook stated that the management approach he preferred could be compared the dairy business, where if the product goes past its date for freshness, then there is a problem. In his role as the Senior Vice President, he closed factories as well as warehouses, and replaced them with contact manufacturers, which resulted in a significant reduction in the inventory of the company from several months to a few days (Jose, 2014). After forecasting its significance, his group made investments in long-term deals including prior investments in flash memory from 2005, and this guaranteed a steady supply of a critical component of various Apple products including the iPhone, iPad and iPod nano. The actions that were taken by Cook at Apple were considered to have reduced the costs of production and together with the design of market savvy of the company, were a source of great profitability. At the beginning of 2007, Cook was appointed as the Chief Operations Officer and went on to serve as the CEO in 2009, in an acting capacity when Steve Jobs had taken a leave of absence so that he could manage his failing health. At the beginning of 2011, the Board of Directors of the company approved the third medical leave of absence for

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

HISTORY - choose 1 of the questions to answer Essay - 5

HISTORY - choose 1 of the questions to answer - Essay Example The Northern states put an end to slavery by the 19th century (Peck 34). Both American and Britain banned slave trade in their countries. As a politician associated to the Republican Party, I strongly supported Lincoln’s idea of eradicating both slavery, as well as the slave trade. By 1860, a majority of northerners became aggravated at the Souths firmness for slavery to be lawful in the Western territories. People in the West and North saw slavery as a unit that needed to be overpowered (Peck 36). The Republican Party argued that the only way slave trade could be conquered was through abolishing it. The Democratic Party supported the South’s use of black Republicanism. The pro-slavery group, created by the Democratic Party, portrayed that the slave trade was gaining power to the United States economy (Peck 36). The risk of slavery growing was a cause of the anti-slavery group in the North. The conspiracy was that the control of the government is exercised by a moderately small number of individuals. The Democratic Party had a common interest in embracing slavery and the slave trade in the South, but the Republican Party did not want to embrace these factors. The Slave Power was an upper crust that alleged slavery was not ethically wrong, but instead a right of the slaveholder. We, North politicians believed that there was a conspiracy amongst the Southern slaveholders to force slavery upon the country. They wanted to wipe out civil liberty, extend slave trade into the territories, perk up the slavery and control the laws of the Federal government. Different opinions from the Northerners, a majority Southerners, viewed slaves as assets of the slaveholder and considered slavery as a Constitutional and legal factor (Peck 38). The slave scheme did not hand out power equally for slaveholders often prohibited state legislatures, media, and education along with economic policies.